Splung.com Physics Forum
Discuss physics or ask questions. Part of the Splung.com physics web site.

Author Message
David Dana-Bashian

Joined: 28 May 2008
Posts: 3
Location: ddb4chess

 Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 8:54 pm    Post subject: angular acceleration I think your formula ω = ω0*t + (1/2)α*t*t on the site http://www.splung.com/content/sid/2/page/angular_acceleration is incorrect. I think the formula should be θ = θ0 + ω0*t + (1/2)α*t*t instead.
hepcj

Joined: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 125

 Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:40 am    Post subject: I think it is correct. The analogy is between linear motion and rotational motion. The formula for linear motion is in terms of velocity. So the rotational analogue is in terms of the angular velocity, omega.
David Dana-Bashian

Joined: 28 May 2008
Posts: 3
Location: ddb4chess

 Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:34 am    Post subject: I disagree. Drop theta0 and let theta correspond to (x-x0) if you like, but otherwise, my angular formula is correct and your third angular formula is incorrect. In your other three pairs of equations, omega corresponds to v, omega0 corresponds to v0, alpha corresponds to a, etc. In your third angular formula, you have omega corresponding to x while omega0 still corresponds to v0. Do you still need more proof that your third angular formula is incorrect? Since omega0*t and (1/2)*alpha*t*t on the right-hand side of the equation are both distances, so is their sum. Therefore the term on the left-hand side of the equation must be a distance, but it is omega, an angular velocity, instead! Do you still need more proof that your third angular formula is incorrect? Compare your first angular formula to your third angular formula. In general, both these formulae, as you have stated them, cannot be true at the same time!
hepcj

Joined: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 125

 Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:03 am    Post subject: You are right it. It is a typo. Thanks.
David Dana-Bashian

Joined: 28 May 2008
Posts: 3
Location: ddb4chess

 Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 1:39 am    Post subject: angular velocity and angular acceleration Now you must decide whether to let theta stand for (x-x0), or to let theta stand for x and theta0 stand for x0. Right now your equations display a mixture of the two replacements. Please decide on one replacement and correct accordingly.
 Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First
 All times are GMT Page 1 of 1